Hello again
dear leader. During yesterday's conversation, we pontificated on how to improve
your life by more than 1%. By taking advice from Mr. Andrew Carnegie, however,
for today's discussion, I thought we would discuss the simple life. Or at least
ponder what it means to appreciate the simple as trying to improve your life,
dear reader. By 1% everyday can be a rather exhausting endeavor. So it's
important to remember to appreciate the small things in life. In other words,
it's okay to stop and smell the roses once in a while. Now I know we've
discussed things such as "living in the moment" and
"appreciating small victories." However, this discussion is slightly
different. Charles Wagner's description of the simple life is designed to give
you something to consider at those moments when life seems to be particularly
stressful this conversation is not designed to advance your understanding of
how to live in the moment, dear reader, but rather, it is designed to give you
a poetic appreciation of the essence of simplicity itself. So should you ever
reach Mr. Carnegie's level of power, wealth and influence the reader. You will
have an appreciation for the essence of simplicity and a way to stay grounded
in the real world... (It should be noted;
the reader that I in no way altered or adjusted the text for today's discussion)
From The Simple Life, 1903
By Charles Wagner
By Charles Wagner
When
one passes in review the individual causes that disturb and complicate our
life, by whatever names they are designated, and their list would be long, they
all lead back to one general cause, which is this: the confusion of the
secondary with the essential. Material comfort, education, liberty, the
whole of civilization — these things constitute the frame of the picture; but
the frame no more makes the picture than the frock the monk or the uniform the
solider. Here the picture is man, and man with his most inimitable possession —
namely, his conscience, his character, and his will. And while we have been
elaborating and garnishing the frame, we have forgotten, neglected, and
disfigured the picture.
Thus
are we loaded with external good, and miserable in spiritual life; we have in
abundance that which, if must be, we can go without, and are infinitely poor in
the one thing needful. And when the depth of our being is stirred, with its
need of loving, aspiring, fulfilling its destiny, it feels the anguish of one
buried alive — is smothered under the mass of secondary things that weigh it
down and deprive it of light and air.
We
must search out, set free, restore to honor the true life, assign things to
their proper places, and remember that the center of human progress is moral
growth. What is a good lamp? It is not the most elaborate, the finest wrought,
that of the most precious metal. A good lamp is a lamp that gives good light.
And so also we are men and citizens, not by reason of the number of our goods
and the pleasures we procure for ourselves, not through our intellectual and
artistic culture, nor because of the honors and independence we enjoy; but by
virtue of the strength of our moral fiber. And this is not a truth of today but
a truth of all times.
At
no epoch have the exterior conditions which man has made for himself by his
industry or his knowledge, been able to exempt him from care for the state of
his inner life. The face of the world alters around us, its intellectual and
material factors vary; and no one can arrest these changes, whose suddenness is
sometimes not short of perilous. But the important thing is that at the center
of shifting circumstance man should remain man, live his life, make toward his
goal. And whatever be his road, to make toward his goal, the traveler must not
lose himself in crossways, nor hamper his movements with useless burdens. Let
him heed well his direction and forces, and keep good faith; and that he may
the better devote himself to the essential — which is to progress — at whatever
sacrifice, let him simplify his baggage.
THE ESSENCE OF SIMPLICITY
Before
considering the question of a practical return to the simplicity of which we
dream, it will be necessary to define simplicity in its very essence. For in
regard to it people commit the same error that we have just denounced,
confounding the secondary with the essential, and substance with form. They are
tempted to believe that simplicity presents certain external characteristics by
which it may be recognized, and in which it really consists. Simplicity and
lowly station, plain dress, a modest dwelling, slender means, poverty — these
things seem to go together. Nevertheless, this is not the case . . .
No
class has the prerogative of simplicity; no dress, however humble in
appearance, is its unfailing badge. Its dwelling need not be a garret, a hut,
the cell of the ascetic nor the lowliest fisherman’s bark. Under all the forms
in which life vests itself, in all social positions, at the top as at the
bottom of the ladder, there are people who live simply, and others who do not.
We
do not mean by this that simplicity betrays itself in no visible signs,
has not its own habits, its distinguishing tastes and ways; but this outward
show, which may now and then be counterfeited, must not be confounded with its
essence and its deep and wholly inward source.
Simplicity is a state of mind. It dwells in the main
intention of our lives. A man is simple when his chief care is the wish to be
what he ought to be, that is, honestly and naturally human. And this is neither
so easy nor so impossible as one might think. At bottom, it consists in putting
our acts and aspirations in accordance with the law of our being, and
consequently with the Eternal Intention which willed that we should be at all.
Let a flower be a flower, a swallow a swallow, a rock a rock, and let a man be
a man, and not a fox, a hare, a hog, or a bird of prey: this is the sum of the
whole matter.
Here
we are led to formulate the practical ideal of man. Everywhere in life we see
certain quantities of matter and energy associated for certain ends. Substances
more or less crude are thus transformed and carried to a higher degree of
organization. It is not otherwise with the life of man. The human ideal is to
transform life into something more excellent than itself.
We
may compare existence to raw material. What it is, matters less than what
is made of it, as the value of a work of art lies in the flowering of the
workman’s skill. We bring into the world with us different gifts: one has
received gold, another granite, a third marble, most of us wood or clay. Our
task is to fashion these substances. Everyone knows that the most precious
material may be spoiled, and he knows, too, that out of the least costly an
immortal work may be shaped. Art is the realization of a permanent idea in an
ephemeral form. True life is the realization of the higher virtues — justice,
love, truth, liberty, moral power — in our daily activities, whatever they may
be. And this life is possible in social conditions the most diverse, and with
natural gifts the most unequal. It is not fortune or personal advantage, but
our turning them to account, that constitutes the value of life. Fame adds no
more than does length of days: quality is the thing.
Need
we say that one does not rise to this point of view without a struggle? The
spirit of simplicity is not an inherited gift, but the result of a laborious
conquest . . . But by dint of action, and exacting from himself strict account
of his deeds, man arrives at a better knowledge of life. Its law appears to
him, and the law is this: Work out your mission.
He
who applies himself to aught else than the realization of this end, loses in
living the raison d’etre of life. The egoist does so, the
pleasure-seeker, the ambitious: he consumes existence as one eating the full
corn in the blade — he prevents it from bearing its fruit; his life is lost.
Whoever, on the contrary, makes his life serve a good higher than itself, saves
it in giving it. Moral precepts, which to a superficial view appear arbitrary,
and seem made to spoil our zest for life, have really but one object — to
preserve us from the evil of having lived in vain. That is why they are
constantly leading us back into the same paths; that is why they all have the
same meaning: Do not waste your life, make it
bear fruit; learn how to give it, in order that it may not consume itself!
Herein
is summed up the experience of humanity, and this experience, which each man
must remake for himself, is more precious in proportion as it costs more dear.
Illumined by its light, he makes a moral advance more and more sure. Now he has
his means of orientation, his internal norm to which he may lead everything
back; and from the vacillating, confused, and complex being that he was, he
becomes simple. By the ceaseless influence of this same law, which expands
within him, and is day by day verified in fact, his opinions and habits become
transformed . . .
The
necessary hierarchy of powers is organized within him: the essential commands,
the secondary obeys, and order is born of simplicity. We may compare this
organization of the interior life to that of an army. An army is strong by its
discipline, and its discipline consists in respect of the inferior for the
superior, and the concentration of all its energies toward a single
end: discipline once relaxed, the army suffers. It will not do to let the
corporal command the general. Examine carefully your life and the lives of
others. Whenever something halts or jars, and complications and disorder
follow, it is because the corporal has issued orders to the general. Where the
natural law rules in the heart, disorder vanishes.
I
despair of ever describing simplicity in any worthy fashion. All the strength
of the world and all its beauty, all true joy, everything that consoles, that
feeds hope, or throws a ray of light along our dark paths, everything that
makes us see across our poor lives a splendid goal and a boundless future,
comes to us from people of simplicity, those who have made another object of
their desires than the passing satisfaction of selfishness and vanity, and have
understood that the art of living is to know how to give one’s life.
Charles Wagner is the epitome of a simple life. He preached that we should live a Christian life, without any dogma. He loved simplicity and he loved nature. I like his idea of being naturally honest and human. Although Wagner didn't say we should give up "things" in order to live a simple life, I read something today that would aid in our living in a less disorderly environment. If each person would get rid of one thing a day, then after one month they would have 30 less items cluttering up their life. Most of us have "things" that we haven't looked at or used in a year or more! However we choose to simplify our lives, I guarantee we will be happier and calmer in today's chaotic world.
ReplyDelete